Reviewing and revising the programme of inquiry

Fifi Anggraini, school academic coordinator, Sekolah Victory Plus, Indonesia

Early Hapsari, PYP coordinator, Sekolah Victory Plus, Indonesia

This article outlines the opportunities and impact of taking a collaborative approach to planning and reviewing the programme of inquiry with a learning community in an Indonesian context, while mapping its national curriculum requirements to the Primary Years Programme (PYP) scope and sequence documents.

Sekolah Victory Plus implements the PYP alongside the Indonesian National Curriculum (INC). The INC scope and sequence is based on Kompetensi Inti (standards set for each year level) and Kompetensi Dasar (the minimum standard of knowledge, skills and attitudes in each subject). We consider the contents of the INC and embed them in our programme of inquiry where possible.

Valuing collaboration  

Formal planning with all teachers happens at the beginning, middle and the end of a unit of inquiry. Single-subject teachers negotiate with year-level teachers on how their subjects can either drive or support a unit of inquiry. We also allocate time for collaborative planning every week, modifying the student timetable so that inquiries end 30 minutes earlier that day. All our planning materials are shared in Google Drive to make collaboration visible.

Collaboration with members of the learning community is key to providing authentic learning experiences and helping students make connections to their learning in the wider world. We collaborate with our Parent Support Group to identify family members who can help develop our units of inquiry based on their expertise. We also create opportunities for students to learn through the wider community, including outreach and excursions beyond school to get information from primary sources. The learning from these community connections feeds back into the review of our programme of inquiry for the following year.

Reviewing and revising the programme of inquiry

The Indonesian National Curriculum focuses more on topic-based learning, whereas the PYP promotes transdisciplinary learning across, between and beyond subjects. We are always looking for ways to embed the national curriculum and local cultures and beliefs within our programme of inquiry. We take a whole school approach when reviewing and refining our programme of inquiry, looking for horizontal alignment under each theme, and checking for repetitions or omissions through vertical alignment.

Step 1:

We review and revise the central ideas based on tips for writing clear and powerful generalizations (Erickson, 2006). We have found these helpful in reflecting on and strengthening our central ideas.

Step 2:

Year-level teachers meet to analyze key and related concepts for horizontal alignment to look for ways to embed Indonesian culture, and to look for any repetition or overlap between units and this impact on student learning.

Step 3:

Year-level teachers meet to analyze for vertical alignment. This discussion includes the descriptors of the transdisciplinary themes, a balance of key concepts and inclusion of all PYP subjects each year.

Step 4:

Teachers meet to discuss mapping the PYP and INC subject-specific scope and sequence documents. We colour-code the subject strands and analyze the programme of inquiry for depth and breadth of learning. We take the skills from INC and integrate them into our curriculum mapping document.

Step 5:

Upper grade students co-create assessment criteria for each central idea; their reflections on learning feed back into our review of the programme of inquiry.

Impact on student and teacher learning

The collaborative process of reviewing a programme of inquiry has had a significant impact on student learning in our school. Our students benefit from:

  • units of inquiry that are more engaging, relevant, challenging and significant
  • a wider exploration of local and global perspectives
  • a deeper understanding of the concepts over each grade and across the grades
  • a greater sense of agency as their reflections feed back into the planning process.

The process has also brought about many learning benefits for our teachers, including opportunities to:

  • engage in sustained dialogue and reflection
  • reach deeper levels of understanding together
  • develop openness to other perspectives
  • look beyond disciplinary boundaries.

Our process for reviewing the programme of inquiry is constantly evolving, based on our feedback and learning from collaboration. Our next step is to find ways to further involve students to ensure they have choice, voice and ownership in their learning.

References

Erickson, L. 2006. Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction for the Thinking Classroom. Corwin Press, A Sage Publications Company, Thousand Oaks, California

Fifi Anggraini (Aini) is the school academic coordinator who coordinates the curriculum continuum from PYP, MYP and DP at Sekolah Victory Plus, an IB World School in Bekasi, Indonesia. She has been a PYP educator for 17 years and a PYP coordinator since 2003.  Fifi has been a member of the IB Educator Network (IBEN) since 2008 as a face to face workshop leader, online workshop leader and a school visiting team member. Her passion is to develop a better education for everyone. She tweets at @fifiaini.

Early Hapsari is also the PYP coordinator at Sekolah Victory Plus. She has been a PYP educator for more than 10 years and is a face to face and online workshop leader. You can follow her on Twitter @earlyhapsari.

Your can follow Sekolah Victory Plus on Twitter at @victoryplus.

 

, ,

One Response to Reviewing and revising the programme of inquiry

  1. gusman 5 December 2018 at 2:22 am #

    Thanks for sharing and awesomely helpful.

Leave a Reply

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Follow

Follow this blog

Get every new post delivered right to your inbox.

Email address