Top Nav Breadcrumb

Let’s build ownership through building a city

Chantell Nawrocki, grade 1 homeroom teacher, Singapore International School, India

Shibani Banerji, grade 1 homeroom teacher, Singapore International School, India

In this article you will read about how Primary Years Programme (PYP) students demonstrated choice, voice and ownership through making connections between two transdisciplinary themes. When ownership is given to learners, the results are endless and the learning is fun—that is what they discovered.

Our grade 1 students were inquiring into the transdisciplinary theme “where we are in place and time” with the central idea of “A city has many systems operating to support the people living in it”. During discussions, we reflected on designing an assessment task that would promote student agency. What ideas would best facilitate student understanding of their own city? Would we give ownership to the students to investigate their city at a deeper level?

We decided to take our reflections back to the students. As a class, we began with ideas involving tabletop clay models to show the services available to citizens in Mumbai. After exploring three lines of inquiry into their city (addressing characteristics, systems and responsibility), the students came up with the idea to build their own city in the classroom.

Initially, we felt that the task seemed difficult and over-ambitious, but through student enthusiasm and flowing ideas, we all started to freely visualize a model of Mumbai in our class. We introduced Google Earth to the students. The students quickly acted upon this and wanted to trace the land, learn about the seas and navigational points. The students gathered loose parts for modeling and collaborated together to lay the foundations to their project.

Google Earth enabled them to see that Mumbai is an island city, surrounded by the Arabian Sea. They located their city on a large-sized world map flowing in concentric circles to finally pin-point Mumbai. The students then decided that there was a need for a transport system. They focused on the two main roads of Mumbai, the eastern and western express highways. They formed the roads and were proactive with bringing in their own toys from home to congest the highways, as they wanted to represent their own experiences of traveling. They decided to add trees, as they wanted some greenery in this concrete city.

Students then reflected upon on our previous unit under the transdisciplinary theme “where we are in place and time” with the central idea of “Homes can be influenced by a variety of factors” and made the connection with Mumbai being densely populated and having a scarcity of space. They came up with many names for Mumbai: the city of dreams, the 7 island city, Bollywood city, concrete city, the city of cities and the financial capital of India, to name a few. Again using maps and Google Earth, the students determined the characteristics of Mumbai: beaches, train stations, tourist attractions, historical monuments, airport—their ideas were endless! Some students persuaded their parents to take them on a tour of Mumbai and send photographs back to class, enhancing the inquiry.

Finally, the grand city was completed. The learners collaborated with ease, they referenced research materials and conducted in-depth inquiries into banking, retail and transport systems. They took full ownership of their learning with enthusiasm and showcased their knowledge and understanding to the entire Primary Division. As teachers, we had to let go and go with the flow of their choices to become facilitators so that we could “see” their voice through the model city!

We were fully aware that this unit of inquiry would have not been so successful, had we not provided opportunities for student voice, choice and ownership. As Bruner (1977) and Vygotsky (1978) advocate, students need scaffolding from their supporting adults within their environment idem. We never thought it would be possible to hear about such intricate ideas from our students. They clearly proved us wrong! Learning clearly needs to be in the hands of the learner and we must become facilitators, not teachers.

References:

Bruner, J. S. 1977. The Process of Education. London: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. London: Harvard University Press.

Shibani Banerji is a homeroom teacher for grade 1 at Singapore International School, Mumbai, India. Shibani has taught in schools in India and South Africa. She joined Singapore International School 5 years ago and is passionate about the early years. She is a Montessori practitioner and thrives on giving ownership of learning to children by allowing them to engage in hands-on activities. You can follow her on Twitter @chloebanerji.

Chantell Nawrocki is also a homeroom teacher for grade 1 at Singapore International School, Mumbai, India. Chantell has taught in schools in India and the United Kingdom. She joined Singapore International School this year. Her passions are to develop reading behaviours in young children. Although she is new to the PYP, her love for inquiry-based learning has encouraged her to quickly imbibe effective teaching and learning practices. You can follow her on Twitter @chantellnawroc1.

 

 

 

, ,

5 Responses to Let’s build ownership through building a city

  1. Deepa 11 December 2018 at 5:59 pm #

    Hi Chantell & Shibani,

    This is indeed awesome.
    Could you please share how you assessed the students and the lines of inquiry.

    Thanks

  2. Malini 12 December 2018 at 12:21 pm #

    Hi Shibani and Chantell
    ThIs is really wonderful, hats off to the students and thanks for sharing such experiences. It’s lovely to see little children being so thoughtful. Good job

  3. gülhan 15 December 2018 at 6:45 pm #

    gerçekten süper olmuş,çok beğendim.Öğrencilerin ellerine sağlık.

  4. Chantell Nawrocki 17 December 2018 at 6:21 am #

    The children firstly showcased their knowledge by using a placemat to show the characteristics of Mumbai. Then through a group role play they showed the different systems operating in a village or city. Afterwards, they created a poster to inform others on their responsibility towards the city. Finally, they showcased their city and a timeline of how to build a city, they became services in the city and showcased their knowledge of transport, banking and retail and distributed their posters to family members and the school community. Each child chose the area of expertise and took control of that area of our Mumbai tour.

  5. Catherin 5 February 2019 at 5:11 am #

    Hi Chantell & Shibani,
    I loved your experience. At school, we work in a similar unit but we have never tried to build a city. I think that it´s a great opportunity to explore their research skills.
    Thanks for sharing with us.

Leave a Reply to Deepa

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.