Top Nav Breadcrumb

What’s the problem with grades?

Alfie Kohn explains why he feels it’s time to re-imagine assessments for deeper learning

Author and lecturer Alfie Kohn, who spoke candidly at the IB Global Conference in October 2016, tells IB World that it’s time to re-imagine assessments to encourage deep and authentic learning.

“There is never a need to reduce a student’s performance to a letter or a number,” says author and lecturer Alfie Kohn. He is described in Time magazine as “perhaps the [US’s] most outspoken critic of education’s fixation on grades [and] test scores.”

Around the world, school grades are synonymous with student progress. However, students who are graded tend to lose interest in the learning itself; and select the easiest possible task, if given a choice, according to Kohn’s research. “This is not because students are lazy but because they are rational. Obviously, the probability that they will get a higher grade – which is what adults are urging them to do – is higher if they avoid challenges,” says Kohn.

Graded students are also likely to think in a more superficial fashion, according to Kohn. “They are less likely to play with ideas because they are more concerned with doing only what is necessary to get the correct answer and secure the higher grade.”

Separate research supports this. A University of Michigan, US, study found that 80 per cent of students based their self-worth on academic performance, while a survey of students at the University of Cape Town, South Africa, found that stress and fear of failing tests led to procrastination, avoidance and disengagement.

Kohn calls grades and tests the “bribe and threat” approach to assessment. “When schools move towards a more authentic form of assessment, students are more likely to think deeply, prefer challenging tasks and fall in love with learning,” explains Kohn.

The alternatives

Offering a qualitative narrative report where teachers describe – using words – what they have observed in a student’s schoolwork is a good alternative to grades, says Kohn. However, a conversation with students, and parents when appropriate, is a great alternative, he adds.

“The best teachers bring students in on the process of figuring out what those benchmarks should be and why, rather than imposing them unilaterally,” says Kohn.

Involving students in designing the curriculum will also encourage meaningful learning, he suggests. “Teachers can ask students what they want to learn, and what feels meaningful to them. It’s about understanding ideas from the inside out, instead of merely memorizing facts or practicing skills.”

But this takes time. Time that many teachers simply don’t have. However, it offers a great opportunity for teachers to get creative. Kohn says: “Bringing students in on making decisions about what (and how) they’re learning requires teachers to give up some control; it takes talent, skill, and courage to create a more democratic classroom.”

He adds: “While many teachers protest that they don’t have that time, the reality is that even high school teachers with large class loads have successfully figured out how to provide meaningful feedback. Some have come to realize that they also save time by avoiding all the tasks related to calculating grades.”

Let students choose their own grades

It’s not easy to just get rid of grades – they’re a deep-rooted tradition in many schools around the world. But teachers can immediately move to help students forget about grades, making them as invisible as possible for as long as possible, says Kohn.

Teachers can avoid putting a letter or number grade on any individual or group assignment that is submitted. And even if they are still required to turn in a final grade at the end of the term, they can ask students to propose the grade rather than unilaterally imposing it on students, suggests Kohn.

“Great teachers let students pick their own grades – this neutralizes many of the destructive and controlling effects of grades, but it also communicates a remarkable level of trust in and respect for students, which can improve the entire relationship and the whole classroom.”

If students believe they are performing to a higher level than what is reflected in their schoolwork, there is a risk that they will become complacent. However, Kohn believes the advantages of abolishing grades outweigh this possibility.

“I believe this fear is largely misplaced,” he says. “Complacency assumes that students are necessarily motivated by grades, so when they are no longer bribed or threatened into learning, they’ll have no reason to do it. In fact, grades only provide extrinsic motivation, which has been shown to reduce intrinsic motivation – that is, less interest in the learning itself.

The absence of inducements like grades doesn’t lead students to conclude there’s no reason to learn; it creates the conditions for restoring the curiosity they started with,” adds Kohn.

“If students do become complacent, that’s an indictment of the curriculum or the kind of teaching that’s taking place – it’s not a reason to continue manipulating them with grades and further undermining their intrinsic motivation.”

Getting parents on board

As for parents who believe grades are essential in learning, Kohn says schools have an important responsibility to change this mindset, and explore why there is resistance to a grade-free environment.

“Our job is to help them imagine what authentic assessment looks like. Sometimes parents demand grades not because they want to have a sense of whether their children are doing well enough in school, but because they want to be able to brag that their children are triumphing over other children. In which case, it is not about a legitimate request for evaluation. It’s an illegitimate desire to set up learning as a competition. It’s important for educators to investigate what lies behind parental nervousness over progress towards a grade-free school.”

Matt Glanville explains why, at the IB, we believe that grades have a future

Matt Glanville, Head of Assessment Principles and Practice at the IB, explains why grades still have a future:

Kohn’s article is a thought-provoking read, and he clearly sets out the dangers of grading students. However there remains a key point to address and that is around how grades are used. What value do they add? This is critical to the whole debate, and we fundamentally believe that if you must choose between two students, their IB grades provide a data point as a way of doing that.

Narrative reports are an excellent way of providing feedback to student and their parents, but if that is the only evidence that you give to a school, university or employer for them to choose between students then they will ultimately compare those narratives and decide on which they believe is better. More importantly, they are likely to do so in a way that is less meaningful or fair than the approach the IB takes when assessing students.

Personal bias is one of the greatest threats to fair decision-making.  Kohn suggests that more authentic tasks are likely to promote deep thinking and encourage students to “fall in love”. We wholeheartedly support this; indeed, it is one of the key principles of an IB assessment. We focus on tasks that assess the higher order thinking skills such as problem solving rather than knowledge recall. But we also recognize the need for comparability and equity for students. This is the challenge we wrestle with when designing meaningful assessments.

It is important to recognize that the IB differentiates between marks. How well a task has been completed; and grades, which consider both the mark and how challenging the task was. In many education systems, this crucial step is missing, which is why in IB assessment you can compare grades meaningfully between years. For example, a ‘grade 4’ means the same thing whenever it is achieved. With our assessment, we are constantly striving to ensure that there is no incentive for students to “select the easiest task”.

Our assessment division charter states our aims very clearly:

To be a thought leader in educational assessment by ensuring we deliver assessments which consider the whole student and encourage excellence in learning.

To support the IB’s educational goals through authentic and valid assessment of our programmes to provide reliable, fair and recognised outcomes for students.”

Therefore, although we greatly respect Kohn’s viewpoints and welcome the debate, we firmly believe that some kind of grading is essential in providing that reliable, fair and recognized outcomes for our students. This will open the right opportunities for them to be able to create a better and more peaceful world.

  • Carl

    I think both of you would benefit from reading Daisy Christodolou’s recent book: https://www.amazon.com/Making-Good-Progress-Assessment-Learning/dp/0198413602

  • Knar

    It seems as if Glanville mainly had the IB final assessments on his mind when writing this. No surprise as these are the only assessments sent to and seen by the IB. Kohn seems to be more concerned with the years leading up to the final assessment, describing student progress during the two years before they take exams. The comparison is between apples and oranges therefor and one view does not stand in the way of the other. I think students would be very well prepared for graded exams when having the mindset Kohn suggests.

  • Adrian vWJ

    Following on from Knar’s observation. Is there really a need to have grades or marks in MYP 1-3? Sure if you are moving to later years, when differentials are needed ,then an argument can be made, but in these transformative years I think Kohn’s remarks should be heeded.

    IB rules tell MYP schools that starting from MYP 1 throughout that each of the 8 subjects must report performance in each of the 4 criteria twice a year. That is a minimum of 64 marks a year. From a look at how we achieve this in our school we find that lots of subjects combine criteria into a single assessment (averaging just under 3 criteria per assessment), But still many subjects prefer (in order to improve the reliability of the marks awarded) to assess criteria more than twice in a year. Overall every student in every grade is given 40-45 marked assignments a year. This is not a unique experience.

    Perhaps then, even if we decide we have to grade – do we really need to do it quite so much?